Brick lane to me wouldnt be the same with out all the gurilla art placed all over the serounding area. the thriving art sceen has led so many international artist self publicating there work on every single freee bit of space, to the extent artists are finding new ways of displaying there work with the use of things like extension pole or ladders to get above the hectik lower levels of the walls. a few artists have become more niticeable then otheres, wethere thats due to repetition of imagry or viberant colours.

this all leads me to quiestion what makes some graffiti more socialy accepta ble then others?????

http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/art,bricklane

documentation of how much the graffiti afects the area and is intrinsikly linked with the atmousfear of east london

“Acclaimed photographer Alex MacNaughton has made it his mission to capture every kind of street art-from stencils to wheatpastes and stickers to murals. Brimming with new works found all over London, this riot of colour, political commentary, passion, and humour is presented in stunning reproductions, each labeled with the street location, and featuring artists such as Sweet Toof, Swoon, and Eine. From femme fatales by CopyRight to huge multi-artist murals by AAGH crew, the scope of this groundbreaking book is reflected in a larger format which shows off the stunning new photography. Illuminated with quotes by the artists and gallerists who show their work, this exciting new book reflects how London as a city, a home, a gallery, and a studio influences street art today.”